Imagine a household with two dogs and two cats. A product allowing up to three pets cannot put all four into one such plan. MetLife says larger households can use additional Family Plans; ask which actual grouping and individual-policy options are offered for these animals. Do not assume the first three entered in the quote flow are the best group.
Request alternative layouts using the same pet details: a shared arrangement for compatible needs plus another contract, or individual policies with the benefits chosen pet by pet. If one animal already has useful ongoing coverage, also price a layout that leaves that policy intact. The point is not to minimize the number of documents at the expense of the animal whose cover is hardest to replace.
This is a fictional household-planning example, not a statement that a particular pet is eligible. Compare the complete price and actual benefits of each offered layout, including any discount restrictions, without adding individual limits and pretending they form one transferable pool.